Ukraine Integrates Indigenous Glide Bomb on MiG-29: A Local Answer to Russia’s UMPK

Ukraine has taken a significant step in developing homegrown standoff weapons, with the first images confirming the integration of a locally designed glide bomb—an analogue to Russia’s UMPK—on the MiG-29 Fulcrum. This advancement underscores Kyiv’s efforts to reduce reliance on Western-supplied precision munitions while increasing survivability of its air force in contested skies.


The Weapon: Ukraine’s UMPK-Style Glide Bomb

The Ukrainian development, often referred to as a KAB (Коригована авіаційна бомба), is essentially a winged guidance kit attached to a conventional free-fall bomb, estimated to be in the 500 kg class.

  • Developer: Medoid Design Bureau
  • Configuration: Free-fall bomb + detachable wing kit + navigation module
  • Range: 60 km in current trials, with goals of 80–100 km under optimal conditions
  • Estimated Unit Cost: $25,000 per kit (~1.2 million UAH)
  • Guidance: GPS/INS navigation, with planned integration of French-made resistant technology for improved accuracy under electronic warfare conditions

The system closely mirrors the Russian UMPK in principle but aims for superior precision and better resilience against jamming.


MiG-29 as a Carrier Platform

The latest photos show the bomb fitted under the port wing of a Ukrainian Air Force MiG-29. This is a crucial milestone:

  • The MiG-29 is the workhorse of Ukraine’s tactical aviation, more numerous than Su-24 bombers.
  • Integration allows mass employment of the weapon, unlike limited Su-24 fleets.
  • Future platforms may include Su-25 attack aircraft, and possibly Western-supplied F-16s and Mirage 2000s.

This step ensures broader operational use and increases sortie potential.


Strategic Importance for Ukraine

Ukraine’s air force has been under heavy pressure from Russian UMPK strikes, which proved nearly impossible to intercept and caused devastating damage from standoff ranges. In April 2023, Russian forces dropped up to 20 UMPK bombs per day; by mid-2025, the figure exceeded 4,000 per month.

For Ukraine, deploying its own glide bomb provides several advantages:

  • Standoff capability: strikes launched outside the range of Russian short-range air defenses.
  • Mass production potential: much cheaper than Western standoff munitions (JDAM-ER, SDB, AASM Hammer).
  • Resource efficiency: Russian air defenses will be forced to expend costly interceptors against relatively cheap glide bombs.
  • Independence: reduced reliance on limited Western deliveries.

Ukrainian media estimate the air force requires at least 100 standoff munitions daily, far exceeding current Western supply.


Technical Comparison: Ukrainian vs Russian vs Western Glide Bombs

FeatureUkrainian KAB (prototype)Russian UMPKUS JDAM-ERFrench AASM Hammer
Base warhead500 kg Soviet bombs250–500 kg OFAB/FABMk-82/Mk-83 (227–450 kg)250–1000 kg
Range60–80 km (goal 100 km)~70 km max72+ km (JDAM-ER)70 km+
Accuracy (CEP)TBD, claimed higher than UMPKModerate, often poor<10 m<10 m
Cost per unit~$25,000<$20,000 est.>$100,000~$200,000
GuidanceGPS/INS (+ EW-hardened module planned)GPS/GLONASS, INSGPS/INSGPS/INS + IR/laser

Challenges and Limitations

Despite promise, several hurdles remain:

  • Operational Accuracy: real-world effectiveness under EW and adverse weather remains unverified.
  • Electronic Warfare: GPS/INS guidance is vulnerable to Russian jamming; resilient alternatives are needed.
  • Production Capacity: funding, materials, and industrial bottlenecks may limit mass production.
  • Certification: integration across different aircraft platforms will take time.
  • Reliability: Russia’s UMPK has shown high failure rates; Ukraine must avoid repeating these flaws.

Outlook

The Ukrainian glide bomb represents a critical bridge capability. It will not match Western precision weapons in sophistication but offers a scalable, affordable solution for high-intensity operations. Its true impact will depend on production rates, guidance resilience, and successful integration across multiple platforms.

If scaled effectively, this weapon could:

  • Sustain Ukraine’s strike tempo across the front.
  • Force Russia into a resource-draining interceptor race.
  • Provide Ukraine with operational independence in long-range strike capabilities.

Social Share or Summarize with AI
Gary Olfert
Defense Systems Analyst

I served as a Colonel in the Central European Armed Forces with over 20 years of experience in artillery and armored warfare. Throughout my career, I oversaw modernization programs for self-propelled howitzers and coordinated multinational exercises under NATO command. Today, I dedicate my expertise to analyzing how next-generation defense systems — from precision artillery to integrated air defense — are reshaping the battlefield. My research has been published in several military journals and cited in parliamentary defense committees.

Show Comments (0) Hide Comments (0)
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments