Taiwan Unveils Indigenous Anti-Drone Rocket Vehicle with Seven-Tube Launcher

In a significant step toward bolstering its short-range air defense (SHORAD) capabilities, Taiwan has unveiled a domestically developed seven-tube rocket launcher vehicle tailored to counter the growing threat of unmanned aerial systems (UAS). The system was showcased at the 2025 TADTE defense exhibition in Taipei and is part of Taiwan’s broader effort to harden its defenses against drone swarms and loitering munitions.

System Overview: A Mobile SHORAD Solution

The newly revealed anti-drone vehicle integrates a seven-tube launcher mounted on a 4×4 light tactical vehicle platform. It is designed specifically for intercepting low-flying drones and loitering munitions at short ranges. The launcher appears to be configured for 70 mm (2.75-inch) laser-guided rockets—likely derived from the Taiwanese-developed Sky Sword series or compatible with existing Hydra 70-based systems.

The system was developed by Taiwan’s National Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology (NCSIST), the country’s principal defense R&D agency. According to official statements and local media reports, the vehicle is optimized for mobility and rapid deployment in forward areas or urban environments where drone threats are most acute.

  • Launcher configuration: Seven-tube pod with elevation and traverse controls
  • Munition type: Laser-guided 70 mm rockets (potentially Sky Sword derivative)
  • Platform: Light tactical wheeled vehicle (4×4)
  • Target set: Small UAS (Group 1–3), loitering munitions

Guided Rockets as C-UAS Weapons

The use of laser-guided 70 mm rockets for counter-UAS roles is not novel but reflects a growing global trend. Systems like APKWS (Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System) in the U.S., Thales FZ275 LGR in Europe, and Turkey’s Cirit have demonstrated that these relatively low-cost precision munitions can effectively engage small aerial targets when paired with appropriate sensors.

Taiwan’s adaptation of this concept suggests an emphasis on affordability and modularity. While kinetic interception of drones is often less efficient than electronic warfare or directed energy solutions for swarm scenarios, guided rockets offer several advantages:

  • Precision kill capability: Minimizes collateral damage in urban areas
  • COTS compatibility: Uses existing munition stockpiles or licensed production
  • Simplicity of integration: Can be mounted on light vehicles without extensive modification
  • Multi-role potential: Capable of engaging ground targets if needed

The key challenge remains sensor integration—detecting small drones at low altitude requires radar or EO/IR systems with sufficient resolution and tracking speed. While NCSIST has not disclosed full sensor suite details publicly, imagery from TADTE suggests an EO/IR targeting pod mounted on the vehicle roof.

Tactical Role in Taiwan’s Air Defense Ecosystem

This new rocket vehicle fills a critical gap between man-portable air-defense systems (MANPADS) like Taiwan’s indigenous Tien Chien I shoulder-fired missile and larger point-defense assets such as Sky Bow III SAM batteries. In particular, it offers mobile protection against Group 1–3 UAVs—ranging from quadcopters used for reconnaissance to Iranian-style loitering munitions like Shahed-136 analogues.

Taiwanese defense planners have increasingly emphasized layered air defense following lessons from Ukraine’s experience under Russian drone assault. The proliferation of cheap FPV drones and kamikaze UAVs has made static defenses vulnerable unless complemented by agile SHORAD units capable of reacting rapidly across dispersed terrain.

The seven-tube rocket system could be deployed in:

  • Urban perimeters: Defending critical infrastructure from drone attacks
  • Austere island outposts: Providing fast-reacting coverage without fixed radar sites
  • Maneuver units: Escorting armored columns vulnerable to top-down strikes from FPVs or loiterers

NCSIST’s Expanding Portfolio of Counter-UAS Tools

This development aligns with NCSIST’s broader push into counter-UAS technologies. In recent years, the institute has unveiled several systems targeting drone threats across multiple domains:

  • T-82 EW Gun: A handheld directional jammer used by infantry units against commercial drones operating via GPS or RF links.
  • C-UAS Radar Pods: Ground-based radars optimized for detecting small RCS targets at low altitudes; some integrated into mobile platforms.
  • Kinetic interceptors: Reports suggest ongoing R&D into micro-missile interceptors akin to Israel’s Iron Sting concept.
  • Civil-military integration programs: Partnerships with academia and private firms to develop AI-based drone detection algorithms using acoustic or visual cues.

Taiwan’s military doctrine increasingly views counter-drone operations as both a homeland defense imperative and an asymmetric toolset that can be exported regionally—particularly as China expands its own drone arsenal across maritime domains near the first island chain.

A Broader Context: Preparing for Drone-Centric Conflict Scenarios

The unveiling comes amid heightened cross-strait tensions and follows multiple incursions by Chinese surveillance balloons and UAS over Taiwanese airspace since early 2023. The PLA’s use of swarms—including simulated attacks using delta-wing loiterers during exercises near Kinmen—has pushed Taipei to accelerate acquisition timelines for C-UAS assets.

This new system complements other recent moves such as:

  • A $146 million budget line item approved in FY2025 specifically earmarked for counter-drone procurement under Taiwan’s Overall Defense Concept (ODC)
  • The deployment of upgraded Skyguard radar suites optimized for slow-speed aerial target detection around major bases including Chihhang Air Base on Taiwan’s east coast
  • Bilateral cooperation with Japan on shared early warning data regarding drone incursions over the East China Sea corridor between Yonaguni Island and Yilan County

If serial production proceeds as expected by late 2026, this indigenous system could become a core element within battalion-level SHORAD formations alongside MANPADS teams, jamming vehicles, and passive detection sensors—all forming part of a distributed kill web architecture designed to survive saturation attacks from both manned aircraft and autonomous platforms.

Outlook: From Prototype to Operational Capability?

NCSIST officials have indicated that field testing began earlier this year at Chiayi Proving Grounds but declined to provide performance metrics such as engagement envelope or hit probability against maneuvering drones. However, based on similar systems globally using laser-guided rockets against Class I UAS (<25 kg), effective engagement ranges are likely between 1–5 km depending on seeker sensitivity and weather conditions.

No export customers have been announced yet; however, given rising demand across Southeast Asia for affordable C-UAS solutions that do not require advanced radar networks or NATO-standard logistics chains, interest may emerge from regional partners such as Philippines or Vietnam seeking alternatives to Western SHORAD offerings constrained by ITAR restrictions.

If successful in trials—and if paired with automated cueing from radar/EO nodes—the seven-tube rocket vehicle could represent an important step toward scalable anti-drone defenses suitable not only for national deployment but also potential foreign military sales under Taiwan’s emerging “defense diplomacy” strategy backed by Washington’s Indo-Pacific security framework.

Gary Olfert
Defense Systems Analyst

I served as a Colonel in the Central European Armed Forces with over 20 years of experience in artillery and armored warfare. Throughout my career, I oversaw modernization programs for self-propelled howitzers and coordinated multinational exercises under NATO command. Today, I dedicate my expertise to analyzing how next-generation defense systems — from precision artillery to integrated air defense — are reshaping the battlefield. My research has been published in several military journals and cited in parliamentary defense committees.

Show Comments (0) Hide Comments (0)
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments